A counterargument is simply a perspective that refutes your main argument for those of you unfamiliar with the term. In other words, if you’re arguing that technology does more good than damage, the counterargument is the fact that technology does more harm than good.
Like to point out: first, I cannot stress how important transitions are in writing effective counterarguments before we look at an example, there are a couple of things i’d. It very difficult – if not impossible – to distinguish between which ideas you agree with and which ideas you disagree with without them, your reader will have no way of following your train of thought and will find.
Another key factor of great counterarguments may be the concession – this is certainly, the acknowledgement that some components of the argument that is opposing legitimate. This is actually the many unknown aspect of counterarguments for most students – is not your whole point of the counterargument to “disprove” the argument that is opposing?
Fundamentally, yes, the target is to show why your argument wins down. Having said that, the purpose of the concession would be to prove that you’ve considered a concern very very very carefully, in a nuanced method instead compared to simple black/white, good/bad terms. When presented obviously, this kind of consideration really strengthens your argument.
You need to use this template that is general produce a counterargument:
According to attitude x, _______________________. On one side,
-it holds true that _______________________.
-this claim has some merit because _______________________.
-the declare that _______________________ has some credibility.
On the other hand,
-this perspective does not give consideration to that _______________________.
-this claim overlooks the truth that _______________________.
Let’s observe how this will play call at an example paragraph that works on the example that is personal, those are nevertheless fine). It does not make use of the template exactly, however it’s pretty close.
Once again, we’re going to make use of the sample prompt released by the ACT. For the true purpose of this workout, we’re just planning to have a look at among the views; wanting to use a lot more than that could be too confusing. In reality, you need to generally avoid integrating a lot more than one outside perspective per paragraph, until you are a stellar author that is currently more comfortable with this particular back-and-forth.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is typically thought to be a indication of progress, but just what is lost as soon as we exchange people with devices? Because of the accelerating variety and existence of smart machines, it really is well worth examining the implications and meanings of these existence within our everyday lives.
Attitude 1: that which we lose with all the replacement of men and women with devices is some element of our mankind. Also our mundane encounters no longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for others.
Thesis: Technology must certanly be regarded as a force once and for all since it produces brand brand brand new opportunities for folks also a far more successful culture.
1) Topic sentence: introduce your argument (1 phrase)
Within the last decades that are few brand new types of technology have actually developed means for individuals talk to one another more easily and quickly than in the past.
2) Elaborate on your own argument, and supply a specific instance (2-3 sentences)
From Skype to iphones apps to Twitter, technology erases edges, permitting us to communicate with individuals halfway throughout the world just as if these were within the next space. We have actually benefitted extremely from the technologies: my children immigrated towards the united states of america from Asia once I ended up being 6 yrs old, and within the last ten years, collecting across the computer to speak to my grand-parents and my aunt in Beijing happens to be a regular ritual. As we did when I was little, I am nevertheless grateful to be able to see their faces and keep them updated on the details of my daily life – something that would be impossible without “smart” machines although I am sorry that we no longer live next door to them.
3) Introduce outside perspective: 1-2 sentences
Not every person is really so excited about the consequences of brand new technologies, but. Attitude 1 provides a complaint that is typical specifically that the replacement of individuals with devices “causes us to get rid of some element of our mankind.”
4) Acknowledge that the viewpoint isn’t completely wrong, and explain why (2-3 sentences)
Using one hand, this problem comes with some merit. Walking down the street or sitting from the subway, i will be usually struck by the number that is sheer of staring glassy-eyed in their phones. Often they are incredibly busy texting which they almost bump into other people, showing a definite not enough courtesy and threshold (notice exactly how this declaration weaves the standpoint obviously in to the writer’s argument) .
5) change returning to your argument and reaffirm it sentences that are(3-4
Having said that, however, the advantages of technology far outweigh an intermittent unpleasant sidewalk encounter – at minimum from my perspeective. As opposed to isolate me personally through the globe (notice exactly exactly exactly how this declaration indirectly refutes the counterargument) , “smart” technology has offered mainly to facilitate my relationships with other people, never to change them.
Simple tips to compose the brand new ACT essay, pt. 2: launching and discussing viewpoints that are supporting
After supplying a synopsis of this brand new ACT essay plus some feasible methods to it in my own past post , i wish to now talk about one specific – and extremely important – skill tangled up in composing it: integrating other perspectives to your very own argument for help.
In the event that you’ve ever written an investigation paper, you almost certainly possess some experience integrating the a few ideas of individuals you trust into the writing. (and when you have actuallyn’t, you’ll get an introduction to performing this in this article.) Having said that, we discover that most schools that are high maybe perhaps not clearly show students to weave supporting quotations, tips, etc. fluidly within their writing. The quotes are there any, but they’re often integrated awkwardly to the bigger argument.
Frequently, pupils assume they don’t need to spending some time presenting or describing their quotes since they appear therefore self-explanatory. They’re here to aid the argument, and then the point of the quotation is obvious…right if the argument is clear? Well, not necessarily.
The problem is the fact that analytical writing requires far more explanation than may seem necessary. In most cases, individuals come up with subjects with that they are familiar. Because they understand lots of about their topics, they usually are unacquainted with the gaps in other people’s understanding. As being result, it merely will not happen to them exactly exactly how explicit they have to be, in addition they wind up accidentally making away information that is required to understanding their way of thinking.
Whenever you explain a thought – any concept – on paper, you need to bring your audience by the hand, as we say, and lead them through each step of the process of one’s thinking procedure so paper writing service they aren’t getting lost. Presenting other people’s terms or a few ideas in a way that produces clear the partnership betwixt your argument and theirs is really a part that is key of procedure. Otherwise, it is just like you’ve missed ahead a steps that are few making your reader to end and decide to try come up with the pieces. If there’s one thing you don’t want to do to your audience, it make your ideas’s difficult to follow. That applies to college, the ACT, and just about every other writing you might do for the following sixty or seventy years.
Once more, we’re planning to make use of the sample prompt released by the ACT.
(Abridged) prompt: Automation is generally speaking thought to be an indication of progress, but exactly what is lost whenever we exchange people with devices? Because of the variety that is accelerating existence of smart devices, it really is well worth examining the implications and definitions of the existence within our life.
Attitude 1: that which we lose using the replacement of men and women with devices is some section of our humanity. Also our mundane encounters no longer require from us respect, courtesy, and threshold for others.
Perspective 2: devices are great at low ability, repeated, jobs, and also at high rate, excessively exact jobs. Both in full instances, they have been much better than humans. This effectiveness contributes to an even more prosperous and world that is progressive every person.
Perspective 3: smart devices challenge our longstanding concept of exactly what people are and that can be. This really is good given that it pushes people and machines toward brand brand new opportunities.